The regional Railway Budget!!

India's political system has long been mired in ugly regionalism.The regional politics has gone to such a height that it tends to belittle the national interests.Will our politicians ever be true to the whole of the nation as a whole? Will they ever atleast try to keep their promises for which they are mandated by common people to hold the incumbent offices-they are enjoying currently? Let's take the case of our current govt , UPA ( part 2 edition). From the time of campaign before Lok Sabha election and till date, their main agenda has been the 'inclusive growth', but till date what we have seen is just a lukewarm response.Yesterday's railway budget presented by Miss Mamata Banerjee is just another chagrin of their own loudly claimed agenda. The budget though claims to be catered to all sections, all regions of the country, yet I think the successive governments fail to identify the importance of including North East region in their 'inclusive' definition.The result, with every reform Miss Banerjee has mentioned, Howrah, Sealdah, Kolkata have been pronounced several times. Why North East region has always been neglected like this? Why are they bereft of something which is their fundamental rights as a citizen of India? In my previous posts also, I have always been claiming the negligence of central government towards North East region. Growth in infrastructure and connectivity are the only ways through which we can placate the 'deep feeling of negligence' among insurgents in the North East region.It has become an exigent issue. If we are going to procastinate the development issues in North East, we are going to create problems to our country itself. The rail budget should have got the importance of connecting few states in North East, rather than connecting unnnecessary stations like Singur with Nandigram and quixotic plan of converting stations like Sealdah to world class standard.

'I have catered to every state, to every part of the country and in that I have done it for bengal too.There is no reason why I should ignore Bengal' – Mamata Banerjee

The above populist statements made by Banerjee are just attempts to shed her image as anti-industry and to ensure easy win for the next lok sabha election. Can Miss Banerjee justify the bold parts above in the statement? Does she not consider the North East region as a part of India? Madam, we are not telling you to ignore Bengal state. If you and your government really consider 'inclusive growth' as the base for India's growth, where is the mention of any state of North-East region in your rail budget? Do your much acclaimed slogan 'ma,mati,manush' not consider North-East region? You don't have any answer for these questions for sure.Mr.Manmohan Singh ji ,instead of complimenting Banerjee for her Bengal- pro rail budget, you should have acted more responsibly, as you are holding the responsibility of running the whole nation and please don't forget,the North-East is also a part of India.

Reform (UPA- Part 2): Class X exam

United Progressive Alliance (UPA) seems to be on the track of many liberal changes in its part-2 edition. Soon after the election 2009 verdict, the newly appointed ministers were asked to act, rather than to talk.Now we can see the results in the form of a few historical change proposals.HRD Minister Mr. Kapil Sibal is in the favour of doing away with Class X board exam to reduce the stress on students and to nullify the number of suicide cases among non-performing students. This is a welcome change as part of the Indian Education System is concerned.But to enforce it in a more effective way so that it doesn't prove infructuous is more important.In TOI dated 2nd July 09, columnist Nandita Sengupta has given some minute details in the article 'exams are not problems', where she opposes the view of Mr.Sibal that exams are the only traumatic drawback that is coming in the way of children's higher studies.In support of this,she unveils the fact of sheer paucity of opportunities thereafter.A poor performing student of lower middle class can't afford to take an educational loan and go abroad for studies of his preference, which the higher class can.In that case, even the percentages are replaced with percentiles will still not make sense. The poor performing student is still left with no options.So, the doing away with one exam will not suffice at all. We need to create more institutions with quality standard with an adequate number of seats there, more job oriented vocational studies and more job opportunities for every stream of study. Then only every section of society will have access to higher education and this in turn,will add value to knowledge base of the country as a whole.Mr. Sibal will have to look from this angle too.

After 17

It took 17 years to probe the most controversial communal injustice act, the Babri Masjid Demolition in December 6, 1992-the Liberhan Committee report appeared yesterday. When asked about the massive delay, Mr. Liberhan imputed the witnesses for their non-cooperation. The whole fuss over this issue which has long been debated over and in the due course of time which seems to be petered out, again has got a new life.This report accused not only the saffron family of the ruthless act, but also the then PM of India Mr. P.V. Rao and the CM of UP, Mr.Kalyan Singh for their incompetence to act rationally and with effect.It is very shameful for the democratic country, when the leaders of the country playing the ball game in the name of secularism. The People of Ayodhya, specially the Muslim community, might have forgotten the whole episode of melodrama in due course of time, but the vengeance will still remain in their blood forever.The penalty will be paid by the generations to follow.The accused will never expiate for the sins they had committed 17 years ago, but time has come to ostracize such moral lepers.The people of Ayodhya, the whole nation in general, should learn from this sinful act and the side effects. This is a wake up call to all Indians.